Recent headlines in the media have cast a
spotlight on previously little-known entities that are
playing a key role in the credit market crisis that has
been spreading throughout the financial markets. These
entities are known as structured investment vehicles.
First created in 1988 by
Citigroup, structured investment vehicles (SIVs) are
investment companies engaged in a type of “carry
trade.” They borrow money using short-term asset-backed
commercial paper issued at a rate closely approximating
LIBOR interest rates. This asset-backed commercial
paper typically is carried anywhere from a few days to a
few months before needing to be refunded. SIVs then
turn around and use the proceeds to purchase
longer-term, illiquid, higher yielding bonds. About
70-80% of the bonds typically bought by a SIV are AAA/Aaa
rated Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) and Asset-Backed
Securities (ABS). The remainder are usually
lower-rated, higher yielding assets such as sub-prime
mortgages blended in to boost overall performance.
Thus, SIVs can be thought of as
funding sources for mortgages, credit cards, student
loans, and similar credit products. SIVs do not need to
be displayed on a bank’s balance sheet and are not
transparent to the majority of the investment community.
Since SIVs are kept “off the books,” they can operate
with little regulation and can become highly leveraged.
Sponsoring banks use them as a loophole to use more
leverage than they otherwise would legally be allowed
to. Citicorp once noted that the leverage in one of
their particular SIVs, Beta Finance, is "only leveraged
14.24 times." When investments perform well, leverage
is wonderful as earnings are greatly multiplied, when
they go sour; leverage is a back-breaker as losses are
equally multiplied.
SIVs seek to earn more on the
longer-term securities they purchase than they have to
pay out in interest and principal on the short-term
commercial paper they issue. In other words, the goal
of the SIV is to earn a net spread between the yield on
its asset portfolio and its funding costs while also
generating fee income for the investment manager.
Currently there are approximately
36 SIVs in existence, with total assets of about 400
billion dollars. Most SIVs are run or sponsored by
banks, however several are managed independently. Below
is a list of SIVs sponsored and run by major banks:
- AIG manages Nightingale
Finance
- Bank of Montreal manages
Parkland Finance and Links Finance
- Citigroup manage a number of
SIVs including Beta Finance, Centauri Corporation,
Dorada Finance, Five Finance Corporation, Sedna
Finance, Vetra Finance and Zela Finance
- Citigroup and Rabobank
jointly manage Tango Finance
- Dresdner Kleinwort manages
K2 Corporation
- HSBC manages Asscher Finance
and Cullinan Finance
- HSH Nordbank manages Carrera
Capital Finance
- IKB managed Rhinebridge
- MBIA manages Hudson-Thames
Capital
- Societe Generale manages
Premier Asset Collateralized Entity (PACE)
- Standard Chartered Bank
manages Whistlejacket Capital and White Pine Corp
- WestLB manages Harrier
Finance
SIVs can earn good profits for
sponsoring banks when the credit markets are properly
functioning, but they are exposed to a liquidity squeeze
if the asset backed commercial paper market shuts down.
This is what took place beginning this past summer.
SIVs have struggled in recent months with selling debt
because a portion of their assets are backed by faulty
US sub-prime mortgages that no one wants to buy.
Normally, risk-averse investors
such as money-market funds, municipalities, and pension
funds buy SIV debt. However, when these institutional
investors stop buying and the short-term commercial
paper debt comes due, serious liquidity problems
develop. When this happens, prices of long-term debt
investments fall and when SIVs suddenly experience an
inability to sell their long term assets, major losses
and write-downs can result.
At the present time there is an
estimated $400 billion in SIVs outstanding with
HSBC SIV affiliates chalking up $35 billion in
debt while Citigroup affiliated SIVs
try to cope with write-downs on $80 billion in assets.
Sponsoring banks have already
announced over $60 billion worth of losses as many of
the mortgage bonds backed by sub-prime mortgages have
declined in value. These losses may be the tip of the
iceberg as many banks have concealed their holdings of
sub-prime mortgages within the SIVs they have
sponsored. Although the banks say they do not own these
SIVs, and are therefore not technically liable for their
losses, they may be forced to cover any losses that may
take place. If a further melt-down takes place within
SIVs, we could see the liquidity crisis persist within
the credit markets and this could have a negative effect
on mortgager loan funding as well as other credit
products. |